If you spend any time on the internet, you will daily see geographical ranking listicles: the best colleges, the best small towns, the best places to retire, the cities with the worst drivers, the states with the worst tippers or the rudest residents.
Sorry, I hate to burst your bubble, but there are NO UFOs except the IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) that our own government is responsible for. I have a family member who was for many, many years employed by DARPA and I got to see, up close, the IFOs that everyone mistakes for UFOs. They can do things you'd lose your mind over. But make no mistake, they can also kill you because they are equipped with DEW (directed energy weapons). And don't think they won't use them on the populace in order to get them to comply with whatever mandate the government wants to impose upon the people, simply by having the public so scared out of their wits that they beg the government to save them... which the government will gladly agree to, if the people agree to do whatever the government demands of them, in which case the government will have complete control of the people. So, no, I do not BELIEVE in UFOs because I KNOW what they truly are.
Bruce, I a somewhat disappointed, you quoted me, and then said that my quote failed to explain why UFOs were hiding in the ocean. You never asked me why they were hiding in the ocean. What you asked me was "Do you think there is any pattern - geographical or otherwise - to UFO sightings and what is it related to?" "I said that there was a pattern and it was related to the ocean."
I also had people emailing me, that are misunderstanding what you wrote about the
'Pentagon faking UFO sightings and abductions to get bigger military budgets.' You said right after this statement that (Youness also advanced this opinion for why we are getting disclosures now.) People are thinking that I think the Pentagon is faking UFO sightings and abductions to get bigger budgets, which is noi true at all. Word for word of what I said in the interview was "What I expect the 'Senate Intelligence Committee' will release (and they will release something) in specific is more video from the Navy in particular. This will also show the location of these sightings within the video. There will be more of course, but this will help the government get more money for the Space Force, the DOD and other space related trips, inventions, committees for monitoring Extraterrestrials, etc..."
If someone (as I was) is courteous enough to give you an interview, you should really use the whole quote, not parts of it, people will get the wrong idea. I had several club members follow the link you put on my page, read it and got the wrong impression. Thank God I had a copy of the questions you asked me and my answers that I put below your questions and were able to send it to them.
I, as well as the members and visitors of the UFO Club Of Virginia are very serious about our research and it is important to me that others know the truth and be honest.
Jessica Youness, President and Founder of the UFO Club Of Virginia~
What is the point of this article? Oh, that's right, it doesn't HAVE one!! It's just a bunch of stupid gibberish that doesn't serve to inform or educate anyone about anything!
The "number of eyes" in any location doesn't mean a damn thing when trying to "adjust" the number of sightings of aerial phenomena, because we have ground based radar installations that each cover hundreds if not thousands of square miles of airspace! All that matters, really, is the number of eyes that are gazing upon land based radar screens and see these objects moving at incredible speeds and doing maneuvers that would cause Humans to black out or even worse! Or imagery from satellites.
If someone is faking these sightings, then what technology and money and personnel are they using to do it? If they have that capability at their current levels, then why do they seek even MORE money in their budgets? This makes no sense at all.
Sorry, I hate to burst your bubble, but there are NO UFOs except the IFOs (Identified Flying Objects) that our own government is responsible for. I have a family member who was for many, many years employed by DARPA and I got to see, up close, the IFOs that everyone mistakes for UFOs. They can do things you'd lose your mind over. But make no mistake, they can also kill you because they are equipped with DEW (directed energy weapons). And don't think they won't use them on the populace in order to get them to comply with whatever mandate the government wants to impose upon the people, simply by having the public so scared out of their wits that they beg the government to save them... which the government will gladly agree to, if the people agree to do whatever the government demands of them, in which case the government will have complete control of the people. So, no, I do not BELIEVE in UFOs because I KNOW what they truly are.
Bruce, I a somewhat disappointed, you quoted me, and then said that my quote failed to explain why UFOs were hiding in the ocean. You never asked me why they were hiding in the ocean. What you asked me was "Do you think there is any pattern - geographical or otherwise - to UFO sightings and what is it related to?" "I said that there was a pattern and it was related to the ocean."
I also had people emailing me, that are misunderstanding what you wrote about the
'Pentagon faking UFO sightings and abductions to get bigger military budgets.' You said right after this statement that (Youness also advanced this opinion for why we are getting disclosures now.) People are thinking that I think the Pentagon is faking UFO sightings and abductions to get bigger budgets, which is noi true at all. Word for word of what I said in the interview was "What I expect the 'Senate Intelligence Committee' will release (and they will release something) in specific is more video from the Navy in particular. This will also show the location of these sightings within the video. There will be more of course, but this will help the government get more money for the Space Force, the DOD and other space related trips, inventions, committees for monitoring Extraterrestrials, etc..."
If someone (as I was) is courteous enough to give you an interview, you should really use the whole quote, not parts of it, people will get the wrong idea. I had several club members follow the link you put on my page, read it and got the wrong impression. Thank God I had a copy of the questions you asked me and my answers that I put below your questions and were able to send it to them.
I, as well as the members and visitors of the UFO Club Of Virginia are very serious about our research and it is important to me that others know the truth and be honest.
Jessica Youness, President and Founder of the UFO Club Of Virginia~
What is the point of this article? Oh, that's right, it doesn't HAVE one!! It's just a bunch of stupid gibberish that doesn't serve to inform or educate anyone about anything!
The "number of eyes" in any location doesn't mean a damn thing when trying to "adjust" the number of sightings of aerial phenomena, because we have ground based radar installations that each cover hundreds if not thousands of square miles of airspace! All that matters, really, is the number of eyes that are gazing upon land based radar screens and see these objects moving at incredible speeds and doing maneuvers that would cause Humans to black out or even worse! Or imagery from satellites.
If someone is faking these sightings, then what technology and money and personnel are they using to do it? If they have that capability at their current levels, then why do they seek even MORE money in their budgets? This makes no sense at all.
Randy